EGU Blogs

Geology Jenga

A DYNAMITE journey around western Ireland

The four-year DYNAMITE project (DYNAmic Models in Terrestrial Ecosystems and Landscapes), a teaching and research cooperation programme between the School of Environmental Sciences, University of Liverpool, UK and the Departments of Geology and Physical Geography and Ecosystem Science at Lund University, Sweden, recently ended with an excursion for PhD students, postdocs and academic staff from both institutions to western Ireland in September 2013.

A brief report from the trip offers an excellent overview of the breadth of Quaternary Science as a discipline, illustrating how we integrate geomorphology, archaeology, geology and palaeoecology, to foster better understanding of local- to global-scale environmental change at varying temporal scales through the Holocene and Pleistocene.

Our route around western Ireland, including Co. Galway, Connemara and Co. Mayo.

Our route around western Ireland, including Co. Galway, Connemara and Co. Mayo.

Archaeology

Our trip began (Day 1) in The Burren, an extensive karstic landscape composed of remarkable limestone pavements and that supports many rare species.

Limestone pavements typical of The Burren. Photo: Uploaded to WikiCommons by HEireann.

Limestone pavements typical of The Burren. Photo: Uploaded to WikiCommons by HEireann.

Michael Gibbons talking about Oyster harvesting, meal preparation and shell waste deposition and modern day exposure of a Neolithic Oyster Midden. Photo: D. Schillereff

Michael Gibbons talking about Oyster harvesting, meal preparation and shell waste deposition and modern day exposure of a Neolithic Oyster Midden. Photo: D. Schillereff

Michael Gibbons guided us around a number of fascinating archaeological sites, many of which feature in this detailed report from the Burren Landscale and Settlement Project. We visited impressive hill forts, court tombs and exposed oyster middens, many of them dating from Neolithic, and in some cases Mesolithic, age.

Many sites in the Burren have yet to be excavated, including these stone piles in the tidal zone; what was their purpose and when were they constructed remains to be discovered.

Stone piles in the tidal zone yet to be excavated. Unknown age and purpose. Photo: D. Schillereff

Stone piles in the tidal zone yet to be excavated. Unknown age and purpose. Photo: D. Schillereff

The trip also ended (Day 6) discussing archaeology, specifically the Céide Fields Neolithic complex at Ballycastle, County Mayo. These field systems enclosed by stone walls represent the most extensive Neolithic Stone Age monument in the world, dating to 5000 – 6000 years ago, and is today mostly covered by extensive blanket peat except for a few isolated areas currently undergoing excavation. The age of the walls is determined by applying radiocarbon dating to fossilized pine stumps preserved in the bog. Seamus Caulfield (Archaeology, University College Dublin) who has focused much of his research career on these sites led an extensive guided tour of the excavations, where the peat has been removed at various intervals revealing the abandoned stone walls.

Professor Seamus Caulfield describing an excavated stone wall section in the Céide Fields. Photo: D. Schillereff

Professor Seamus Caulfield describing an excavated stone wall section in the Céide Fields. Photo: D. Schillereff

While individually the piles of stone do not initially appear tremendously impressive, when the spatial extent (>10 km2) and perfectly parallel construction of the walls is considered, the enormous scale of Neolithic agriculture in the region is unveiled. What is also of great interest is the rarity or lack of preservation of a monument of similar age elsewhere in northwest Europe. It appears most likely that a regional decline in pine forests (indicated by pollen reconstructions) meant stone walls were constructed at great effort, instead of the log walls constructed from forest timber at the time elsewhere in Europe.

Palaeoecology

A short boat ride on Day 2 took us to Inis Oírr, the smallest of the Aran Islands, led by Karen Molloy (National University of Ireland, Galway). The small field boundaries struck me as unusual but apparently such land division has a long history in western Ireland (as we discovered at the Céide Fields). Karen presented the impressive lake sediment sequence of An Loch Mór; the unique setting of the lake means the >13 m of sediment deposited here records a fascinating story of palaeoecological change (e.g., Holmes et al. 2007, QSR) through the late-Glacial and Holocene periods, including insight into local ice retreat at the end of the last glaciation, sea-level and salinity changes, vegetation history and phases of exceptionally high windspeed due to its exposure to the Atlantic Ocean.

Later in the trip (Day 4) we tracked down a small exposed organic deposit exposed in a fluvial terrace at Derrynadivva that contained many large plant macrofossils. It turns out these deposits are not Holocene in age; rather, they are remnants of plants growing during a previous Pleistocene interglacial. It remains uncertain which interglacial is represented here however based on analysis of the pollen and plant macrofossils, the deposit possibly represents Oxygen Isotope Stage 11 (Hoxnian; e.g., Coxon et al. 1994 JQS).

Interglacial deposit containing many large plant macrofossils exposed in an alluvial terrace. Photo: D. Schillereff

Interglacial deposit containing many large plant macrofossils exposed in an alluvial terrace. Photo: D. Schillereff

Glacial Geology and Geomorphology

We visited a number of sites around Co. Galway, Co. Mayo and Connemara (Days 3 – 5) with Professor Peter Coxon (Geography, Trinity College Dublin) and Dr Richard Chiverrell (Environmental Sciences, University of Liverpool) to examine the complex, fascinating and still-unresolved history of Late Glacial ice-retreat in western Connemara. The stunning landscape of Connemara bears vast evidence of ice-sculpting during the last glacial period, including the elongated fjord of Killary Harbour, the Twelve Bens mountain massif that rises almost directly from the sea and the partly submerged drumlin field at Clew Bay.

View over the drowned drumlin field in Clew Bay. Photo by K. Campbell, Geograph.org, from WikiCommons

View over the drowned drumlin field in Clew Bay. Photo by K. Campbell, Geograph.org, from WikiCommons

This exposed drumlin was particularly impressive as it is a rare example of coastal erosion revealing a length-wise cross-section through the middle of a drumlin. One can thus walk along the beach examining its internal sedimentology in great detail. The sharp contact to angular facies at the head of the drumlin, suggesting coarse sediments rapidly deposited by sub-glacial meltwater in a cavern beneath the ice, was especially neat.

Exposed internal structure of a drumlin. Photo: D. Schillereff

Exposed internal structure of a drumlin. Photo: D. Schillereff

Angular facies at drumlin head related to deposition of coarse sediment from a sub-glacial meltwater stream. Photo: D. Schillereff

Angular facies at drumlin head related to deposition of coarse sediment from sub-glacial meltwater stream. Photo: D. Schillereff

We visited quarries at Tullywee cut into a subacqueous fan series related to ice retreat (~20 – 18 k years ago) that imply a water-surface of 60-65 m above IOD and the large ice-contact delta at Leenaun at the end of Killary Harbour that exhibits a classic Gilbert-style structure and also implies a high shore-level of 78 m IOD. The causal mechanism(s) for this high sea-level stand have yet to be fully deciphered, especially the question of whether the water at these ice-contact features was glacio-marine (much higher local sea-level than models or other reconstructions possibly suggest) or glacio-lacustrine (enormous ponds dammed by ice further seawards, requiring immensely complex ice-streaming configuration). More discussion of these implications can be found in Thomas & Chiverrell, 2005 QSR.

A series of eskers at Tullywee. Photo: D. Schillereff

A series of eskers at Tullywee. Photo: D. Schillereff

Many pristine examples of glacial geomorphology were observed during the trip, for example the eskers at Tullywee, as well as much smaller features such as this ‘dropstone’ in a small exposure in the Leenaun delta. One could easily stroll past and not realise the significance of this cobble; the deformed sediments indicate we were adjacent to a calving margin and this cobble exited the iceberg as it floated seawards and was deposited in the soft sediments below.

A 'dropstone' deposited in the bottomset sediments of Leenaun delta. Photo: D. Schillereff

A ‘dropstone’ deposited in the bottomset sediments of Leenaun delta. Photo: D. Schillereff

It was a wonderful trip, tremendously educational and certainly a place I’d love to visit again for its visual beauty and ideally for the purpose of research as there is much yet to be understood about the Quaternary environments of western Ireland.

For interested readers, the Quaternary of Central Western Ireland (edited by Professor Pete Coxon, 2005) contains a wealth of further information on many of these sites and other case studies.

Making the most of your PhD – Part I

It’s been a busy few weeks and one of the reasons for it has been that I’ve recently taken part in an entrepreneurship competition.

I attended a three day workshop, where me and my team were given training and guidance on innovation and how to commercialise research. At the end of the three-day workshop, teams present and pitch their ideas for an imaginary environmental start-up company in competition with each other. I wrote a blog post on the whole experience for my lab blog (http://www.geomagnetism.org/, apologies for the shameless plug!), to which I also make regular contributions. I’ve attached a link to the post about the entrepreneurship competition here.

Commercialisation of research may not be an area of interest to all of our readers, so that’s why I’ve chosen not to include the full post here. However, the post very nicely introduces another post that I’m preparing, which I hope will go live in the next couple of weeks: Making the most of your PhD. In that post, I’m going to explore how, although the main focus of a PhD is undoubtedly the research you are conducting, there are lots of opportunities out there for you to maximise the skills you can gain during the PhD process. Like I say, keep tuned to the blog in the next couple of weeks for more on that front!

10 Minute Interview – Volcanic Lightning, amongst other things!

It has been a while since our last 10 Minute Interview, we thought it was time to post another.

They are proving to be some our most successful posts. Sourcing people to take part hasn’t been too difficult (yet!) but if you think you might like to contribute, Dan & I are always looking for people to speak to, so don’t hesitate to get in touch if you think you might want to help us!

Sandra_Zaovolcano

Image courtesy of Sandra Karl

So, this weeks interviewee is Sandra Karl, for Leeds University. I  met Sandra a few years ago, at the BGA conference (see my post about the conference). At this year’s conference we had a lot of talk about, as we are at very similar stages in our PhD (the very scary final year) and have both been thinking about career options etc… If you remember from my post about BGA, Sandra gave one of my favourite talks and her research interestingly combines volcanology and seismology.

Vital Statistics

  • You are: Sandra Karl
  • You work at: School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds
  • Your role is: final year PhD student

 

Q1) What are you currently working on?

My PhD investigates one specific type of volcano seismic signals, called long period seismicity. After doing a lot of work with numerically modelled data I have most recently started to look at real seismograms, in the nature of a case study based on Soufriere Hills Volcano in Montserrat, West Indies. I try to analyse the waveform shapes and amplitudes as well as apply moment tensor inversion and location techniques to the data to gain information on the depth and location the earthquakes were generated, as well as the physical mechanisms within the volcanic edifice that yield the seismic signals under investigation.

 

Q2) What is a typical day like for you?

After checking my emails and dealing with urgent matters right away I usually set up a to-do list for the day (yes, I am German and can’t get through a day without a list!). The rest of the day  I then usually spend on active research and some thesis writing. During term time student contact hours loosen up my day a bit which is great! I get to do demonstrating on various geophysics modules such as Time Series Analysis and Fundamentals of Geophysics.

And of course, because my job title is after all still PhD STUDENT more than one day a week ends with a brief visit to the pub with some of my PhD fellows!

 

Q3) Could you provide a brief insight into the main findings of your recent paper/research?

I am currently writing a paper about the main findings of my PhD. We aim to show that the commonly used point source assumption for seismic sources in tectonic settings cannot always be adapted into volcanic settings. In particular, the physical process underlying volcanic LP events is the rupture of a spatially extended source, the magma column in the conduit.

 

Q4) What has been the highlight of your career so far?

While at the IAVCEI 2013 conference in Japan earlier this year I, for the first time in my life, saw a pyroclastic current and volcanic lightning in the eruption cloud of the erupting Sakurajima volcano in Kagoshima.

Events like this really remind me why I chose to become a Volcanologist!

 

Q5) To what locations has your research taken you and why?

Since starting my PhD I have been travelling a lot, for many different reasons. Oral or poster presentations at international conferences have taken me to: San Francisco (USA), Vienna (Austria), Colima (Mexico), Kagoshima (Japan), Bristol (GB), Oxford (GB), Cambridge (GB),  and Durham (GB). As a demonstrator on student field courses I have visited Lanzarote and Pembroke (Wales). And to undertake field work for my or a colleagues projects I also went to Turkey and Montserrat.

 

Q6) Do you have one piece of advice for anyone wanting to have a career similar to yours?

Before accepting a position make sure that you are entirely certain what the project you will work on includes! In order to be successful in a PhD and stay motivated and enthusiastic you have to love what you are doing, and commit to it on a daily basis. Over the years I have met many PhD students who started a PhD because they ‘were offered’ one, and found themselves looking out for other options after a very short time.

 

Q7) If you could invent an element, what would it be called and what would it do?

Snadrium – The Snadrium would start to glow one day before a volcano is about to erupt! This would make eruption forecasting much easier, and could save many lives!

Sandra completed her undergraduate degree and M.Sc at the LMU in Munich, Germany. While a student there, she visited Colima in Mexico as a volunteer working at the Volcan de Colima, which made her decision do pursue a PhD in Volcanology very easy! Sandra then came to the UK as a PhD candidate in 2010. Volcanoes are not only her job but also her passion, and her goal is it to climb a volcano on every continent of the Earth one day.
Outside Volcanology, she does a lot of running and other sports to stay sane!

Soliciting peer reviews from PhD students

This post does not discuss science per se but the topic is important from a personal point of view and hopefully useful to others in a similar position (i.e., PhD student currently putting together their first papers and hoping to learn more about the peer-review process). Feedback from those at a similar stage as well as more experienced members of academia is most welcome.

The British Society for Geomorphology Annual Conference held last year in Nottingham featured a Meet the Editor workshop for Early Career Researchers, including PhD students, which was a resounding success. It was hosted by Editors from several prestigious Geomorphology-focused journals and attendees learned more about the process of submitting a paper, gleaned considerable advice on the Do’s and Don’ts of academic publishing as well as what Editors are seeking in a good manuscript review. Until this workshop I had not considered PhD students as viable reviewers, but the positive encouragement from Editors at the workshop led me to investigate further the potential to act as a reviewer for other Journals. The responses were intriguing and I feel they are worth sharing with the wider community.

My research area is reconstructing recent environmental change, particularly historic floods, using lake sediment records but I am interested in most branches of Quaternary Science so I set about contacting Editors of various relevant journals. I explained I was a PhD student, that I had recently attended a workshop where the possibility of acting as a reviewer was highlighted and enquired as to their feelings on soliciting reviews from PhD students.

Firstly, I can confirm each Editor kindly replied very promptly with a detailed response. The responses fell into three general categories:

  • Some thanked me for my interest and stated that, while they recognized it would be a tremendous opportunity for a PhD student to be involved in the peer-review process, they felt it was inappropriate for one major reason: our lack of breadth of knowledge of the literature outside our specific fields. I tend to agree; while I attempt to read extensively around all aspects of Quaternary Science and try to keep abreast of recent methodological developments, I have no doubt that my three years’ experience of reading as a PhD student has barely scratched the surface of relevant literature. A member of staff in my Department who acts as an Associate Editor for a peer-reviewed journal confirmed this as being their view too.

  • Secondly, some Editors replied saying they had simply never before considered asking PhD students to act as reviewers. They invited me to submit my contact details and indicated they’d perhaps be in touch in the future. This suggests it is rather uncommon?

  • The third theme was entirely positive; Editors replied confirming they had solicited reviews from PhD students in the past and, in fact, these reviews had turned out to be some of their highest-quality reviews. The student had clearly taken the responsibility extremely seriously and had spent a huge amount of time going through manuscript in great detail. In these cases, I was asked to provide my contact details and they would add me to the database and be in touch if an appropriate manuscript appeared, which I was delighted to do.

  • I have intentionally left this post rather open-ended. I’d love to hear from any PhD students who have acted as a reviewer in the past. Did the Editor contact you directly or did your Supervisor put forward your name? (I’ve heard of this before from other colleagues). Was it challenging? Fun?

    I’m also keen to hear thoughts of those with much more peer-reviewed publishing experience on the appropriateness of PhD students as reviewers or from Editors in any field as to whether they have solicited reviews from PhD students in the past. If so, how did you go about finding them? I imagine the most common source is via an academic search engine (i.e., GoogleScholar, Scopus, etc.); this suggests once you have published your first paper, you are much more likely to receive requests to act as a reviewer. Is this indeed the case?

    Contact me on Twitter (@dschillereff) if the information may be of relevance to a wider audience, or indeed in the Comments section below.

    (Photo uploaded to the public domain on WikiCommons by M. Imran)

    (Photo uploaded to the public domain on WikiCommons by M. Imran)