EGU Blogs

Matt Herod

Matt Herod is a Ph.D Candidate in the Department of Earth Sciences at the University of Ottawa in Ontario, Canada. His research focuses on the geochemistry of iodine and the radioactive isotope iodine-129. His work involves characterizing the cycle and sources of 129I in the Canadian Arctic and applying this to long term radioactive waste disposal and the effect of Fukushima fallout. His project includes field work and lab work at the André E. Lalonde 3MV AMS Laboratory. Matt blogs about any topic in geology that interests him, and attempts to make these topics understandable to everyone. Tweets as @GeoHerod.

Photo of the Week #27 – Someone’s had a few too many

The photo of the week came to me this morning on my walk to school. Yes, it is now warm enough in Ottawa to comfortably walk to school! All the melting ice and the slight smell of spring and undergrad panic in the air got me thinking about permafrost degradation and nights out during my undergrad. An odd combination of thoughts, I grant you. Well, what do these two very separate things have in common? Observe the photos below, particularly the trees in the hillside to find out.

(Photo: Matt Herod)

(Photo: Matt Herod)

The trees all look a little askew. This is because they are the epitome of a “drunken forest”. Many of you may not have encountered this amazing term, which I assure you is the real one, for trees that sit on degrading permafrost  or ice wedges that become drunkenly tilted as the ice melts. The ground underneath the tilted trees also looks somewhat heaved which is characteristic of melting permafrost terrain. I took these photos just outside of Dawson city next to ongoing placer mining operations.  So there you have it. The strange explanation for what links the melting of spring ice to memories of my own spring experiences in undergrad (never now…).

Cheers,

Matt

Geology Photo of the Week #26

The photo of the week is another great example of Pleistocene giantism in mammals. In the photo you see a recent (very) leg bone from a kangaroo held next to the fossilized leg bone of a Pleistocene kangaroo, known as Procoptodon. HUGE DIFFERENCE! The bone from the ancient kangaroo is at least 10-15cm longer and much, much thicker.  Procoptodon, stood around 2m tall and weighed in at a massive 230kg! Compare this to a modern kangaroo which, while similar in height, only weighs about 90kg. You can see the difference in the bones….

(Photo: Matt Herod)

I took this photo in 2009 during my trip to Australia at a friends sheep station near Port Augusta. You may have seen other photos of the week from this same place such as stromatolites, or the mystery fossil (seriously, what is it?). It was, without a doubt, the most diverse geological place I have ever been. These Pleistocene remnants were found there, along with others from giant wombats. The owners have also found ancient emu egg shell, and arrowheads from early aboriginal people. Gold exploration has taken place nearby as well as an oil well was drilled and produced a few barrels…don’t ask me how gold and oil can be found on the same property…it blows my mind.

Anyway, enjoy the pic.

Cheers,

Matt

Guest Post: Solar Storms and the Earth’s Protective Shield – Laura Roberts Artal


I am a PhD student at the University of Liverpool Geomagnetism Laboratory.  My current research project is the palaeomagentic study of 3.5-3.2 billion year old rocks from South Africa. The aim of my research is to improve our understanding of the long term evolution of the Earth and the surface conditions under which the first forms of life originated through using palaeomagnetic records. The rocks of the Barberton Greenstone Belt are excellently preserved and have only been subjected to low grade metamorphism (greenschist facies), making them good candidates for paleomagnetic studies.  I also undertook my undergraduate studies at Liverpool University, where I studied monogenetic volcanism on Tenerife. Between my undergraduate and PhD I had a brief stint in the world of industry as an environmental consultant. I’m a keen science communicator and am involved in a number of outreach projects.

 

An article last month in the U.K’s Guardian Newspaper reported on the findings of the Royal Academy of Engineers who warned the U.K government of the need to set up an expert panel which could generate plans on how the country should prepare and cope in the event of a large solar storm or corona mass ejection (CME). What was not reported in the article and is often unknown, is that we already have a shield that goes some way to protect us from the harmful effects of out giant neighbour; but I’m getting ahead of myself. Let start with a few basics.

In essence, a solar flare is a large release of energy at the Sun’s surface, which can be followed by a CME. Solar flares tend to be short lived events and eject a cloud of charged particles, including protons, electrons and atoms. CMEs often follow flares and tend to emit considerable gusts of solar wind and magnetic fields. When the winds and charged particles reach the proximity of planet Earth, they interact with the Earth’s magnetic field causing a magnetic storm with the charged particles being preferentially deflected towards the Earth’s magnetic poles. Magnetic storms can cause disruption to electronic grids and communication systems, including satellites, aircraft, GPS navigation systems and mobile phone networks, amongst others. The Royal Academy of Engineer’s report was making reference to these potential harmful effects and arguing that the U.K. should prepare itself against them. In truth, they don’t exaggerate, the damage that solar flares can cause is not negligible: In September 1859, a large solar flare caused telegraph wires in both the United States and Europe to spontaneously short circuit, causing numerous fires; Northern Lights were seen as far south as Rome, Havana and Hawaii, with similar effects at the South Pole. More recently, in March 1989, a large solar flare caused a blackout in the whole of the Quebec province of Canada, whilst the Canadian television network and newspapers were disrupted by damage caused by a solar flare to communication satellites orbiting the Earth in 1994.  I won’t go into the details of how and what we ought to be doing to protect ourselves against these (this is not my field!). Instead, I’ll tell you about the Earth’s Magnetic field and its role in protecting us against the harmful storm winds and particulate clouds.

My research focuses on some of the oldest rocks in the world. I study the Barberton Greenstone Belt (BGB), which is located in North Eastern South Africa and is one of a few Archean aged terrains located across the globe.

The BGB is characterised by volcanic sequences which are interspersed with layers of sediments. It has been subjected to a number of tectonic events which have led to folding and low-grade metamorphism in the area. The world famous type-section of Komatiite lavas, as discovered by the Viljoen brothers in 1969, is exposed in the BGB. My research is concentrated on three Complexes of the Onvenwacht Suite, with rocks showing ages between 3.5 and 3.2 billion years (geological map modified from de Wit et al. 2011). But, how can these rocks tell us anything about solar storms, CMEs and the Earth’s magnetic field?

We now that the Earth’s magnetic field acts a shield against the harmful particles ejected by solar flares, deflecting them pole wards. In addition, it protects us against atmospheric erosion and water loss caused by solar wind. The lack of a magnetic field on Mars (generate by a geodynamo in the core), leaves the planet barren with no atmosphere or water. The early Earth was able to retain its atmosphere and water and so became habitable (with early forms of life being reported in the BGB). However, we know little about the Earth’s magnetic field during this time. Studying the paleomagnetic signature of the rocks of the BGB might enlighten us about the processes that were taking place in the core, mantle and crust during the Archean.  My research focuses on the directions of the magnetic field recorded in the BGB during its formation. Recent studies (Tarduno et al, 2010) have attempted to understand the strength of the field during the Archean and what bearing that might have on the ability of the planet to protect itself against solar winds. In their study, Tarduno and collegues, report paleointensities (obtained from single silicate crystal bearing magnetic inclusions) that are ~50-70% lower than the intensity of the present day field.  How much then, could the Earth’s magnetic field reasonably be expected to shield the planet from the Sun? Tarduno et al. argue that solar particles would have greater access to the Earth’s atmosphere during this period, due to an increased polar cap area. During the Archean, the stand-off distance between the Sun and the Earth could also be estimated to be smaller. These two facts combined would promote loss of volatiles and water, suggesting that the early Earth had a larger water inventory than presently. Overall, the young Earth was able to produce a magnetic field strong enough to protect the planet from large scale atmospheric erosion and water loss, it is likely that there were important changes to these in the first billion years of the Earth’s history.

I find it reassuring that there is this invisible shield that is protecting us humans, (perhaps not our technology), and has been doing for most of the Earth’s history. The Magnetic field has contributed to the conditions being right for evolution to happen. I think we should give it a lot more credit!

Please see below for a selection of links that might be of interest for those who might want a bit more reading on the subject!

http://www.geomagnetism.org/

http://www.peeringintobarberton.com/project.html

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/8659019.stm

http://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/sun_darkness.html

http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2003/23oct_superstorm/

Laura Roberts Artal

Geology Photo of the Week #25

The photo for this week is something a bit different. It is a piece from my personal collection that was self collected. Ok, full disclosure, my dad actually found it, but I was over on another rock pile in the quarry and finding jack at the time…so it is self collected….I did help extract it after he found it. I should also mention that they were repaired and enhanced by a professional to make them really “pop” out of the rock. However, no parts were added. They were found as complete specimens.

I don’t want to steal any paleontological thunder from Jon, but I have a fair amount of experience in paleo, particularly invertebrate paleo. In fact, the part of southern Ontario that I grew up in is stuffed with Ordovician fossils such as the trilobites pictured below. These particular trilobites, known to my family and others as “Bert and Ernie”, can be classified as Isotelus gigas, which is a common species in the region. However, complete trilobites of this size are exceptionally rare and to find them as a pair is simply ridiculous. Bert and Ernie were found in Colborne Quarry, a limestone aggregate quarry, famed among local collectors for its fantastic fossils. I used to go  to the quarry on a regular basis and found all sorts of great stuff over the years from complete crinoids to 1.5m cephalopods. Unfortunately  the company that owns the quarry has closed it to collecting and access is no longer possible. However, there are still lots of other places in the area where it is possible to collect in the same rocks. Stay-tuned for more personal collection highlights in the future. I have nice cephalopod that is hiding an unusual secret…

Cheers,

Matt