GeoSphere

Archives / 2013 / February

Geology Photo of the Week #23

The incredibly colourful photo of the week is a picture that I took at the Canadian Museum of Nature. It shows what has to be one of the most spectacular pieces of ammolite that I have ever seen. Ammolite is a bit of a mysterious substance and it is found in only a few places on Earth, notably in the Canadian Rockies.

An incredibly bright piece of ammolite at the Canadian Museum of Nature. Click for a larger image. (Photo: Matt Herod)

Ammolite is actually considered a gemstone and it is one of the few official gems that has a biological origin. Ammolite, unsurprisingly, is found mostly on ammonites, which are extinct relatives of today’s squid and octopuses. It is actually formed of the original aragonite shell material. During the Cretaceous, when most of western North America was covered by a large tropical ocean the ammonites, and dinosaurs thrived in the area. The ammonites eventually died and their shells were covered by very fine clay/ash. Burial continued and this ash, which contained lots of iron, potassium and other metals, prevented the aragonite shells of the ammonites from altering to calcite, which is how most fossils are preserved. This is what gives ammolite the spectacular colours we see now.

Today ammolite is found only in a few units of the Bearpaw formation, which reaches from Alberta to Montana. This makes ammolite an extremely rare gemstone, albeit a somewhat fragile one, since it is quite soft. Despite the rarity of ammolite it is also relatively inexpensive. Indeed, a quick search on Ebay showed loads of pieces for under $10.

Cheers,

Matt

The Truth about Radon

There are few things on Earth that evoke more fear than radioactivity. Most people’s response to radioactivity is one of immediate fear and confusion and I can’t say I blame them. There is something very frightening about a substance that shoots off invisible rays that can kill you if you’re exposed to enough of them. However, most people really don’t need to worry about being exposed to large amounts of radiation in their lifetimes. That said we are all exposed to radiation all the time. There is no escaping radioactive materials. They are in the food we eat, the water we drink and the air we breathe.

This constant exposure to radiation is called background radiation and there is simply no way to avoid it. The largest portion of background radiation comes from the radioactive gas, radon, which composes around 50-60% of our background radiation exposure. Radon is one of the most innocuous, yet ubiquitous radionuclides around and it is crucial that everyone be conscious that we all inhale some radon and what this means for our health.

The chemical symbol for radon (Source)

As with most things radioactive the first questions asked are: what is it and where did it come from? How does it behave in the environment and what does this mean for me and others (aka: is it dangerous)?

What is it and where does it come from?

Radon, chemical symbol Rn, is an odourless, colourless radioactive gas. In order to understand where radon comes from we have to discuss the radioactive decay of uranium, which is its source. Uranium is a radioactive metal that occurs naturally in almost all places on Earth. The major isotope of uranium is 238U. 238U comprises 99% of all uranium isotopes and has a half life of 4.47 billion years. One of the daughter products produced by the decay of uranium is radon.

Figure 1 shows the decay chain of Uranium-238, the most common form of uranium. Here α is Alpha radiation and β is Beta radiation

The decay chain of Uranium-238 (Source)

As the diagram above shows, the decay of 238U occurs over many, many years and there are several steps to be taken before radon is produced. There are two modes of decay shown in the diagram above: alpha and beta. Alpha decay is the radioactive decay process that occurs when the nucleus of a radioactive element ejects two neutrons and two protons (a helium nucleus). Alpha particles have a low penetration ability, but can be very energetic. This means that they cannot travel very far or through objects, but they have a high enough energy to be dangerous to living things when they are emitted very near them. Ingesting or inhaling alpha emitters is dangerous to people but, merely being in their presence is not as dangerous since alpha particles cannot penetrate skin. The other type of radiation emitted during the decay of uranium is beta. Beta decay involves the emission of an electron from around the atom and it is more penetrating than alpha radiation. Gamma radiation is also emitted at several steps in the uranium decay process.

As these alpha particles and electrons are emitted, the decay progresses and eventually radon is produced. The radioactivity that comes from radon when it decays into Polonium-218 constitutes an alpha particle that has an energy of 5.59 million electron volts, which is quite high.

How does radon behave?

The meaning of the question how does radon behave encompasses several other questions such as: how does it travel and how does it interact in the environment and where in the environment is it produced?

The noble gases. Notice radon is the only one sitting, because he is the heaviest. Haha, a little chemistry humour there. (Source)

Radon is a noble gas. This means it is very un-reactive in the environment and does not interact readily with other compounds or elements around it. This also means that in the environment radon travels all on its own and does not attach itself to other elements as a way to get around. This independent behaviour does not hinder the ability of radon to transfer from air to water and back again, in fact, radon transfers very readily between the two. As a gas radon is present in the atmosphere, in the gas trapped between soil grains, it can even be found dissolved in groundwater or surface water.

Up until now I have been taking it for granted that radon is in the environment, but I have not explained how it gets there in the first place. In order to do this we have to look for the uranium. Uranium is present ubiquitously throughout the environment. It is in soil, it is in rocks, it is in the oceans, it is even in lakes, rivers and groundwater. Of course, as we know, the decay of uranium produces radon and since there is uranium in pretty much everything radon can be produced from all of these places. The amount of radon produced is proportional to the amount of uranium present. And what controls the concentration of uranium in soil and rocks? The geology. I have included a table below showing average concentrations of uranium that one might expect to find in different bedrock types. As you can see they vary wildly from massive concentrations in an ore body, where the radon is practically pumped out of the rock to groundwater, which in carbonate sedimentary regions has almost no radon. Obviously there are lots of exceptions to these situations, but they do provide a general guideline from which to base predictions about the amount of radon that we might find in a house built on any of these rock types. Indeed, it is possible to predict, based on the bedrock alone, whether or not a house is likely to have elevated radon levels in the soil or groundwater. These are not hard and fast rules since so many other factors can affect the radon concentration in a house at any given time such as humidity, air pressure, temperature, etc, but they are at least a starting point.

Material Concentration (ppm U)
High-grade orebody (>2% U) >20,000
Low-grade orebody (0.1% U) 1, 000
Average granite 4
Average volcanic rock 20 – 200
Average sedimentary rock 2
Average black shale 50 – 250
Average earth’s crust 2.8
Seawater 0.003
Groundwater >0.001 – 8

(Source)

Is radon dangerous?

The short answer to this question is: yes, radon is indeed dangerous. The why, how are we exposed and what can we do about it are a bit longer. As I mentioned above radon is an alpha emitter, meaning that it is only dangerous when we are in very close proximity to it or it has been ingested or inhaled. Furthermore, once in our body the radon will continue to decay and produce other daughter products such as 214Pb and 214Bi, which are also highly radioactive and very dangerous. The unfortunate thing is that it is very easy for us to inhale radon making it extremely dangerous. In fact, it is estimated that ~10% or more of lung cancers are caused by radon inhalation, making it an extremely serious threat to human health.

Radon accumulates in confined spaces such as in our houses or other buildings, particularly in basements as radon is heavier than air. In the open air there is no threat from radon, however, Canadians and many other northern cultures spend a great deal of their time inside, especially during winter (it is  -20 with wind chill as I write this). This is a major concern as all of this time spent indoors can greatly increase radon exposure.

So how does radon get indoors and why does it accumulate there? Firstly, radon can enter our homes through two main pathways. It can come in as a gas through holes in our basements, sump pumps, windows… essentially any place where our homes are connected to soil or rock, it will even diffuse through walls with ease. It can also enter in our water, especially if we use groundwater. Once radon is dissolved in water it needs to interact with air in order to leave the water so a perfect place is our taps, and showers which cause air-water interaction and force any radon dissolved in the water to de-gas.  The source of radon for our homes has to do with the type of soil and bedrock where we live. If there is lots of uranium in the soil or bedrock our homes are built on then there will be lots of radon produced as well. Radon also tends to accumulate in basements by dint of its large mass. It is by far one of the heaviest components of air and therefore tends to sink.

how radon enters a house

Pathways that radon can take to enter a house (Source)

In Canada the Health Canada limit for radon in air is 200Bq/m^3. Here is a map showing where radon exceeds this level in Canada.

Figure 2.

Radon map of Canada showing the percentage of dwellings above 200Bq/m^3 (Source)

The figure shows a mean 222Rn emissions map from soil for 2006. Since I now blog for the EGU I thought I should include a Europe version as well. (Source)

Happily, there are lots of simple remedial actions that you can take to get rid of radon. These generally constitute plugging access point and installing ventilation from the basement so that the air pressure in the basement is greater than outside and the radon will not migrate into the basement. Radon test kits are also readily available in most hardware stores so that you can test the radon levels in your home yourselves.

Case Study: My undergrad thesis….

Radon is not all bad though. There are uses for it too…there is always something. One of my first summer jobs in the geology industry was as a hydrogeology field assistant for a professor of Civil Engineering who specialized in the ridiculously complicated field of fractured bedrock hydrogeology. I worked for several of his grad students during the summer and one, who is now a professor at McGill University, was looking at radon concentrations in the groundwater and surface water of a local watershed.  He was looking to see if it was possible to trace and quantify groundwater discharge into surface water using radon.

This project then led me to propose a radon in water investigation for my honours project, although the aim was a bit different. I was looking to see if radon could be used as a tracer of radioactive waste in groundwater and surface water. I was working in Port Hope, Ontario at a low-level radioactive waste site and sampling the adjacent creek and installing some mini-piezometers. I have added the abstract below so you can see what I found. Long story short though, radon was elevated in both surface and groundwater although not where I expected it to be.

Port Hope, Ontario is home to 1.5 million cubic metres of low-level radioactive waste. This waste decays to produce the noble gas radon. Radon can be used as a tracer of waste migration in groundwater and surface water. In this experiment radon was sampled in a creek adjacent to a waste site in order to determine if elevated radon was produced by low level radioactive waste and if it could be found in water. Previously measured dissolved uranium concentrations were also used to determine if uranium and radon were linked in surface water. Background levels of radon in an uncontaminated local river was 18.1 +/- 6.28 pCi/L. Radon in water was detected in the field using a radon-in-air analyzer with an alpha spectrometer and outfitted to analyze water samples. The water samples were placed in a sealed chamber and forced to degas. This gas then entered the radometer and was analyzed. Elevated radon levels were detected along the length of the creek with the highest readings being 115 pCi/L upstream of the waste site and progressively dropping along the reach to a low of 45 pCi/L due to degassing. The trend in the radon was opposite to the trend in the uranium data with a high of 0.032mg/L adjacent to the waste site and a low of 0.017mg/L upstream at the same point of highest radon. The source of the radon is therefore hypothesized to be previously contaminated groundwater entering the creek at a point upstream of the waste site. The source of the uranium is solid waste that is present in the creek as well as aqueous complexes that have undergone redox transformations in organic mud present at the waste site. The flow of the creek is too fast for radon and uranium to achieve equilibrium. Therefore, these two contaminants are not linked in this system. This has implications for understanding the movement of uranium and radon in natural systems and how they may be related in nature from a hydrogeological and geochemical perspective.

By the way, in case you were wondering 1pCi/L is equivalent to 37Bq/m^3. Therefore a measurement of 115 pCi/L is 4,225 Bq/m^3. Remember, this is in water though so the transfer to air changes things a lot.

Links:

Health Canada:

http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/ewh-semt/radiation/radon/index-eng.php

Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission:

http://www.nuclearsafety.gc.ca/pubs_catalogue/uploads/February-2011-Radon-and-Health-INFO-0813_e.pdf

Matt

Note: This post was previously published at my pre-EGU blog Geosphere on March 4, 2011. Although several changes and new sections were added to this post.

Geology Photo of the Week #22

I have been posting a lot lately about the Yukon. So for a change of pace the photo for this week comes from Australia…about as far from the Yukon as it is possible to get. This is a photo looking down on a mat of stromatolites. They are the round shapes poking up through the limestone.

Stromatolites in the Flinders Ranges near Port Augusta, South Australia (Photo: Matt Herod)

Fun with PHREEQ at Red Creek

Most freshwater on earth is not that highly saturated with dissolved metals or minerals. However, there are exceptions to be found all over the world from natural acid rock drainage to the alkali springs of Jordan. If the concentrations of dissolved metals are high enough the water can be toxic. For example, water draining from gold mines is often very high in arsenic and must be contained and cleaned. It is incredibly important to understand what will happen to these dissolved ions because they have profound implications on the health of the environment and people. Water like this can occur naturally or due to mining, deforestation, or other human industrial activities.

One tool that we can use to understand water and what is happening to the dissolved metals and minerals is the geochemical modelling program called PHREEQC a.k.a PHREEQ (pronounced freak) to those in the business. PHREEQC is pretty much the industry standard amongst geochemists for modelling the composition and behaviour of dissolved ions and minerals in water and every aspiring geochemist has to be familiar with the basics of the program and what the information it provides is telling us. PHREEQC is a quick, easy and free way to do a huge number of tedious calculations really, really quickly. Yep, that’s right, it’s free on the USGS website, which is another great thing about it.

PHREEQC works by taking the concentration of ions in water such as calcium, sodium, sulphate, etc and calculating the concentration of these ions that actually participate in geochemical reactions at certain temperatures, pressure, salinities, pH’s and redox conditions.   Once we know these values PHREEQC then calculates how much of these ions and the minerals that they combine to form are dissolved in the water and if they will precipitate out of solution to form actual minerals. It can do a lot more than this as well such as incorporate isotopes, model ion-ion interactions, ion-surface interactions, etc.

For this post I thought it might be interesting to show the PHREEQC output from one of the creeks that I sample called Red Creek and it is a bit of a weird one. Red Creek is located in the central Yukon and the most notable thing about it is the colour of the water and the rocks around it.

A view of Red Creek. Note the milky coffee colour and the red stained rocks. (Photo: Matt Herod)

Close up of a very iron stained rock. (Photo: Matt Herod)

As you can see the rocks around Red Creek are red and black. They are shale and are loaded with all sorts of interesting elements, particularly iron. In fact the iron concentration in this water is about 3 ppm, the nickel and zinc values are 0.3 and 0.9 ppm respectively and the sulphur concentration is a whopping 340 ppm. These numbers are all way out of the ordinary for the rest of the creeks I sampled throughout the Yukon. In fact, the Fe, Ni, and Zn values are at least 10 times higher than anywhere else! WOW…(did I just find a new mine?…I wish)

—————————-Description of solution—————————-

pH = 6.790
pe = 4.000
Activity of water = 1.000
Ionic strength = 1.170e-002
Mass of water (kg) = 1.000e+000
Total carbon (mol/kg) = 2.435e-004
Total CO2 (mol/kg) = 2.435e-004
Temperature (deg C) = 25.000
Electrical balance (eq) = 2.563e-004
Percent error, 100*(Cat-|An|)/(Cat+|An|) = 2.15
Iterations = 10
Total H = 1.110128e+002
Total O = 5.552116e+001

I have included some of the highlights for what is called the saturation index. Basically this number tells us if a mineral is under-saturated in the water, meaning it will stay in solution or over saturated, meaning it will precipitate. If the number is negative the mineral is undersaturated and will not precipitate and if it is positive it is over saturated and will. In Red Creek there are hundreds of mineral species that are undersaturated and only a handful that are oversaturated. I have listed the oversaturated ones below. Some of these numbers are super high such as magnetite and hematite, which are clearly  the ones precipitating on the rocks.

Barite — 0.47 — BaSO4

Fe(OH)2.7Cl.3 — 6.54

Fe(OH)3(a) — 1.89

Fe3(OH)8 — 2.35

Goethite  — 7.78 — FeOOH

Hematite — 17.57 — Fe2O3

Maghemite — 7.17 — Fe2O3

Magnetite — 18.83 — Fe3O4

ZnSiO3 — 1.12

Red Creek is obviously a pretty wild place geochemically and the PHREEQC modelling opens the door for us to interpret it. There is a lot going on and one has to ask, where did all of the high concentrations of these metals come from? Well, in this case the question is a fairly easy one to answer. All you have to do is look around at the bedrock.

Some nicely bedded, overturned shales in the Red Creek region (Photo: Matt Herod)

The local bedrock is black shale, a rock that is notoriously full of metals due to is high organic content. Red Creek is fed by springs issuing from the shale  and the groundwater, which has had moved from its recharge point to discharging in the creek, has had time to leach metals from the rock.  The water gets so loaded with metals from the bedrock that it carries them along as minerals in suspension as well as dissolved, which is why the water is that weak coffee colour. Actually, when the spring emerges from the shale the water is not white/red. It is, in fact, black!!! And I mean jet black. This is because it is loaded with reduced iron in suspension. Once the iron oxidizes at the surface it turns red. Futhermore, there is so much sulphur in the water that elemental sulphur often precipitates around the springs and the reduced, and highly toxic form of sulphur, hydrogen sulphide gas is bubbling out of the water as well because of the massive partial pressure difference in H2S in the atmopshere versus the water. What a wonderful place for a geochemist!!

A spring coming out of the shale near Red Creek. Yes, that water is black!!! (Photo: Matt Herod)

Places like Red Creek have interesting geochemical stories to tell. In this case the dissolved metals are naturally occurring and no one lives in the area so no remedial action is necessary to make the water drinkable. However, water like this has major impacts on the life that can survive in the region and in the creek. Indeed, natural places like this are home to a wide variety of life that has adapted to survive and flourish in these harsh conditions that are found in very few places on Earth and we can learn a lot about life on our planet and potential life on others from places like Red Creek. However, if such a water body was the result of mining operations it is absolutely necessary that it be treated lest is thoroughly contaminate the local environment with heavy metals such as arsenic or mercury. It is the geochemists responsibility to ensure that places like this are understood so that when remedial actions are necessary the lessons learned from natural places can be applied.

Hope you enjoyed this geochemical adventure to Red Creek!

Cheers,

Matt

Some nicely stained shale showing the high water mark in the spring at Red Creek. (Photo: Matt Herod)